Tag

accessibility

4 articles on accessibility.

Color accessibility, in practice

Color accessibility is mostly one question asked repeatedly: can someone who is not you, on hardware that is not yours, in a room you have never been in, read this? The standards exist because the honest answer is usually no, and because designers are the worst possible judges of their own work — you already know what the text says.

WCAG 2.2 answers it with a contrast ratio, a single number derived from the relative luminance of two colors. It is a blunt instrument. It ignores font size below a threshold, ignores font weight almost entirely, and treats a hairline serif at 24px as equivalent to a bold sans at 24px. APCA, the model drafted for WCAG 3, weights those things properly and reports polarity — light-on-dark and dark-on-light are not symmetric to the human eye, and the older ratio pretends they are.

Neither model is a substitute for the other yet. WCAG 2.2 is what conformance is measured against and what an audit will cite; APCA is what will tell you why a technically-passing combination still looks weak. Run both, and when they disagree, believe APCA about appearance and WCAG about compliance.

All 4 articles

Tools for accessibility