Comparison

RGB vs CMYK

One model adds light, the other removes it. That is not a detail — it changes which colors are reachable and which conversions can be trusted.

Short answer. Design in RGB and convert to CMYK only at the end, using a profile for the actual press — a formula-based conversion is fine for a mockup and should never be the file you send to print.

RGB is additive: a display starts black and emits red, green and blue light, and more of each gets you closer to white. CMYK is subtractive: paper starts white and each ink absorbs part of the spectrum, so more of each gets you closer to black. The two run in opposite directions, which is why their gamuts are different shapes rather than one simply being a subset of the other.

Most of what is reachable in sRGB is reachable in CMYK, but the exceptions are the ones people notice: bright saturated blues, vivid oranges and anything approaching a screen green print dull. Conversely, some CMYK colors — certain deep cyans, and anything using a spot ink — cannot be represented in sRGB at all.

The part that matters most in practice: a correct RGB to CMYK conversion needs an ICC profile describing a specific press, ink set and paper stock. That is measured information no formula has. The converter on this site, like every formula-based converter, uses the naive transform. It is useful for approximating a shift and for spotting colors print cannot reach. It is not a proof and it is not a deliverable.

RGB vs CMYK, side by side

DimensionRGBCMYK
ModelAdditive — emitted lightSubtractive — absorbed light
ChannelsRed, green, blueCyan, magenta, yellow, key (black)
Starting pointBlack; adding light brightensWhite paper; adding ink darkens
Typical mediumScreensPrint
Gamut strengthsSaturated blues, greens, cyansSome deep cyans; spot inks beyond sRGB entirely
Gamut weaknessesCannot show some print colorsCannot reach screen-bright blues, oranges, greens
Conversion accuracyRequires an ICC profile; formulas approximate
CSS supportNativeNone — not a web color model

Where this comparison is unfair

The black plate is not a simple fourth channel. How much of a neutral is built from K versus from equal parts CMY — grey component replacement, and total ink limits — is a decision the press profile makes, and it changes both the appearance and the cost. A naive conversion has no view on any of it.

If colour fidelity across screen and print genuinely matters, the answer is not a better formula. It is a soft proof through the actual output profile, and ideally a physical proof from the actual press.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between RGB and CMYK?

RGB is additive and describes emitted light on a screen; CMYK is subtractive and describes ink absorbing light on paper. They run in opposite directions and reach different sets of colors, so neither gamut fully contains the other.

Why do my colors look different when printed?

Usually because a saturated screen color is outside what the press can reach and has been mapped to the nearest printable one — bright blues and vivid greens are the common casualties. Sometimes it is also the paper: an uncoated stock absorbs more ink and prints noticeably flatter.

Can I convert RGB to CMYK accurately without a profile?

No. Accurate conversion requires an ICC profile characterising the specific press, ink and paper, which is measured data no formula contains. A formula-based conversion approximates the shift well enough for a mockup and nothing more.

Should I design in RGB or CMYK?

Design in RGB and convert at the end. RGB has the wider working gamut and every editing tool is faster in it; converting early throws away color you cannot get back, and locks you to one output profile before you know which press will run the job.

Try it yourself

Definitions

Other comparisons